Origin of the Hungarian language
Looking for precise and professional language translation? Look no further! I specialize in accurately translating English to Haitian Creole, French, and Spanish.
Trust me to deliver exceptional results that capture the essence of your message. Contact me today for flawless language translations.
In this clip I talk about the origin of the Hungarian language, and its early speakers' migration to the Carpathian Basin.
The origins of Hungarian are deeply rooted in ancient Siberian language and culture.
Samoyedic didn’t branch off of Uralic, it’s the root of Uralic and everything else branched off. Finnic languages mixed with an unknown precursor substrate and Ugric languages took in a significant amount of Iranic and Turkic influence.
Samoyedic being the root of Uralic is not a mainstream theory, just so the people reading this know.
Language families have common ancestor languages. The last common ancestor of Samoyedic and Ugric no longer exists. This is part of a science called linguistic phylogenetics or more technically “quantitative comparative linguistics”.
They are turkic
No they aren’t lmao
any proofs?
Sure. And English is Afroasiatic.
Yeah sure…
@@mlgdigimon they pretty much are, especially szekelers
Full video linked under username🎯
I like the fact that Hungarian can be surrounded by languages which aren’t its sister languages.
Just like Romania.
No it is much closer to Italy and Spain😊@@Rondo2ooo
@@Rondo2oooRomanian is still an indo-European language though Hungarian has nothing in common with neighboring languages.
@@Rondo2ooo the Balkans used to be Romance speaking (specifically Italo-Dalmatian) until the Slavs settled there, separating Romanian from other Romance family.
@sansumida The original commenter mentioned “surrounded”, not close or closer. Therefore, my comment is correct. 😉
These are theories. There is also a lang family called ural-altai lang. fam.
Debunked
That’s a long discredited theory, fam.
The Altaic language family has not been generally accepted in the field of historical linguistics since at least the 1960s, and if you read the literature, there is a multitude of reasons for that. Further, you are using the word “theory” as though it means “guess.” This appears to be based on a common misunderstanding of how science works.
Whether languages are genetically related or not is established based on rigorous analysis and mountains of data, to the extent that both of those things are possible. The Uralic language family and its internal organization is a fairly well-studied and well-documented area in historical linguistics, and it is therefore not especially appropriate or honest to suggest that experts are engaging in guesses. That being said, we can and should of course always strive to learn more.
Very interesting!
Fascinating.
What about Huns that came to Europe? “Hungarians”. There are horseback riders that are verry simmilar in Hungary with those of ancient Huns.
Possibly a related group, me personally I think the uralic family has roots with turkic and so the huns are just a cousin of the magyars
Huns were a Turkic tribe completely unrelated to Hungarians.
Hungarian also has words from Turkic languages, the loanwords
Indeed. When the ancestors of modern-day Hungarians migrated to the Carpathian basin, they came in contact with various Turkic people (like Bulgars, Chuvash, Cumans, Avars). The Hungarian language gained lots of Turkic influence.
Finno-korean hyperwar